Last updated January 13, 2010 22:33, by Ken Cavanaugh
Test and Hudson issues for CORBA
- Test execution time
- The following tests take longer than 2 minutes to execute:
- (All tests run on Quad, a quad core 2.2 GHz AMD machine)
- corba.folb_8_1 (9:45)
- corba.fragment (8:31)
- corba.msgtypes (5:50)
- corba.rogueclient (2:58)
- corba.strm2 (3:41)
- pi.clientinterceptor (2:34)
- pi.serverinterceptor (4:13)
- pi.serverrequestinfo (6:22)
- Total time: 43:54
- These 8 tests take probably 60-80% of the CORBA test execution time
- The following tests take longer than 2 minutes to execute:
- Code coverage:
- The following packages show 0% method coverage:
- com.sun.corba.ee.impl.folb (tested in corba.folb: need to re-enable this test now that we are post-GFv3)
- com.sun.corba.ee.impl.oa.rfm (tested in corba.rfm: why not reported here?)
- com.sun.corba.ee.impl.orbutil.concurrent (tested in corba.connectioncache: why not reported here?)
- com.sun.corba.ee.impl.orbutil.transport (tested in corba.connectioncache: why not reported here?)
- com.sun.corba.ee.impl.osgi.loader (well tested in GFv3)
- com.sun.corba.ee.impl.osgi.main (really test code: now excluded in emma coverage)
- com.sun.corba.ee.impl.plugin.hwlb (this one is not currently tested)
- com.sun.corba.ee.impl.presentation.proxy (this package should be removed from test coverage and delivery)
- com.sun.corba.ee.impl.txpoa (only used in GF, trivial implementation)
- com.sun.corba.ee.spi.legacy.connection (do we need this in GF?)
- com.sun.corba.ee.spi.legacy.interceptor (do we need this in GF?)
- com.sun.corba.ee.spi.orbtil.argparser (do not need to deliver this: now excluded in emma coverage: tested in build)
- com.sun.corba.ee.spi.orbutil.concurrent (some testing should take place in corba.connectioncache test)
- com.sun.corba.ee.spi.orbutil.file (do not need to deliver this: now excluded in emma coverage. Tested in build)
- com.sun.corba.ee.spi.orbutil.threadpool (just interfaces)
- com.sun.corba.ee.spi.orbutil.transport (just interfaces)
- com.sun.corba.ee.spi.osgi (just interfaces)
- The following packages show 0% method coverage:





