Bruce Schubert
|
Posted: January 28, 2010 10:37 by Bruce Schubert
|
Any opinions on some alternatives to kenai.com:
|
Alternatives for Kenai.com?
55 posts
Replies: 54 - Last Post: May 07, 2011 07:56
by: dengdai
by: dengdai
Peter Mount
|
Posted: January 28, 2010 10:40 by Peter Mount
|
|
For me mercurial is a must, and preferably Jira as well... Sourceforge to me is still klunky at times, google code is a little spartan (& doesn't support mercural), and java.net has just been too unstable if late |
radim
|
Posted: February 02, 2010 15:30 by radim
|
|
Google Code does support Mercurial - http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ChoosingAVersionControlSystem -Radim |
B. Gian James
|
Posted: February 03, 2010 02:23 by B. Gian James
|
| ...but doesn't support using a CDDL license. Otherwise, google code would be a clear migration choice for me. |
Hemant Shah
|
Posted: January 28, 2010 13:36 by Hemant Shah
|
|
We have used Assembla (http://www.assembla.com/) in the past and were very happy with the features it offers. - Hemant |
john_brock
|
Posted: January 28, 2010 16:59 by john_brock
|
|
Theoretical only..... If Java.net had the kenai infrastructure under it, like Netbeans.org does today, would folks move to Java.net? --jb |
Fabrizio Giudici
|
Posted: January 28, 2010 17:06 by Fabrizio Giudici
|
| I would move IMMEDIATELY! |
|
Bruce Schubert
|
Posted: January 28, 2010 17:06 by Bruce Schubert
|
|
Hi John, Yes, Java.net is high on my list of candidates. I want to stay close to the NetBeans and Java community. -- Bruce |
Christian
|
Posted: January 28, 2010 17:13 by Christian
|
|
Depends on what you mean with "infrastructure". Actually, I would not care too much about the look. But if the speed would improve and if the integration into NetBeans would be moved to java.net, I would certainly move (back) to java.net. One thing which should be adopted from kenai.com is certainly the speed of development. kenai improved conastantly, while jeva.net shocked me (and others I'd guess) with the disastrous 5dot2stage-project, which makes me believe that the next upgrade will be one week after the release of Duke Nukem forever...  However, there are some projects here on kenai.com which are not java-projects, I think they would not move. Also, while the easy creation of projects here on kenai.com might have created lots of "garbage projects", I would personally miss that. |
ranjit vamadevan
|
Posted: March 22, 2011 16:40 by ranjit vamadevan
|
| i'm from india. would you please tell how to connect javaDB from NetBeans IDE 6.7. |
Eric Heumann
|
Posted: January 30, 2010 20:47 by Eric Heumann
|
|
I would be very interested in moving to Java.net in such a case. I've always found navigation of Java.net very difficult. I'm a younger programmer, but it also strikes me as being very old and ugly, which discourages me. After perusing through the site several times, I still have no idea what features it has. It's just that place I have to occasionally visit to get more information on core projects like OpenJDK, and those aren't pleasurable experiences. Kenai is much easier to navigate, its feature set is understandable, and its interface is bright and clean. That's my opinion, Eric |
marco.bresciani
|
Posted: January 31, 2010 10:12 by marco.bresciani
|
| I'll move immediately as well... Kenai integration with NetBeans and Java and all its features... well... great! |
Andreas Huber
|
Posted: February 02, 2010 16:04 by Andreas Huber
|
| Sure. Can we move to Netbeans, as they have kenai already? |
John Yeary
|
Posted: February 02, 2010 21:10 by John Yeary
|
|
Are you and Shar going to do this tonight? I think a lot of people would consider going back to Java.net if the underlying infrastructure were something like Kenai. KNOCK...KNOCK...Oracle should follow the white rabbit and consider doing it. John |
RecursiveQuickSort
|
Posted: February 05, 2010 14:34 by RecursiveQuickSort
|
| None of those provide simultaneous real time editing like Developer Collaboration, SubEthaEdit, Gobby, Google Wave, Etherpad, Code Collaboration. Project Kenai was supposed to replace Developer Collaboration for Netbeans, but does not offer the same functionality. Source code repository plugins are already available for NB. |
|
kwiecienm
|
Posted: February 09, 2010 13:22 by kwiecienm
|
|
Hi, There is a new alternative - http://www.emforge.net - we have just started our beta phase and there are two/three more weeks till SVN hosting is fully ready - that is fully automated when creating project. Please take a while and check it out - there is a great task organization system which I hope You'd find very useful (and pleany of more like wiki, forum, blogs). So at the moment if You'd like SVN hosting for project You'd create - please contact me - marek.kwiecien@gmail.com. I could also assist with migration. Have a nice day, Marek -- |
|
Bruce Schubert
|
Posted: January 28, 2010 11:21 by Bruce Schubert
|
|
I pulled this Wikipedia link from another thread: Comparison of open source software hosting facilities. |
|
Bruce Schubert
|
Posted: January 28, 2010 12:39 by Bruce Schubert
|
|
GitHub is another alternative. The NetBeans OpenGL Pack just migrated over to it. http://github.com/mbien/netbeans-opengl-pack |
|
Peter Mount
|
Posted: January 28, 2010 13:14 by Peter Mount
|
|
Yes GitHub looks good if you use git repos - i'm just looking at bitbucket as I use mercurial... http://bitbucket.org/ Don't get as much space as github but it looks like it will do |
Replies: 54 - Last Post: May 07, 2011 07:56
by: dengdai
by: dengdai
