Re: I really like Ioke. How can I help?
- From: Ola Bini <ola.bini@gmail.com>
- To: Carlos Villela <cv@lixo.org>
- Cc: dev@ioke.kenai.com
- Subject: Re: I really like Ioke. How can I help?
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:46:42 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DRge5AxoTmC6S6pU5kB/mInR5tZjnEbE74520caZ9ORNL8U3QWbZ1bBkNQ7bRQu9z+ aLZHLb7ApILVeu/9Wk6MKegVF/cKBHw3nf7Vy2f1KfFpPNAY4xvE5vL3sqzg3FEtwpVl QyzSStVtj3oouMDm3JQ93hBfvQJg0XbTOV3cs=
Carlos Villela wrote:
Hey Ola,Yeah, it's deliberate. The reason is that the x is appended to the more unusual case, and I think that an activatable lecro is much more useful, but I'm sure a block is generally not good activatable.
lecrox - like a lecro, but isn't activatable
fnx - like fn, but is activatable
Was that inconsistency deliberate? If so, why?
Cheers!
Carlos
--
Ola Bini (http://olabini.com) JRuby Core Developer
Developer, ThoughtWorks Studios (http://studios.thoughtworks.com)
Practical JRuby on Rails (http://apress.com/book/view/9781590598818)
"Yields falsehood when quined" yields falsehood when quined.
| Brian Guthrie | 01/05/2009 | |
|
Message not available |
||
| Carlos Villela | 01/05/2009 | |
|
Message not available |
||
|
Message not available |
||
| Carlos Villela | 01/05/2009 | |
| Ola Bini | 01/05/2009 | |
| Carlos Villela | 01/05/2009 | |
| Sam Aaron | 01/05/2009 | |
| Carlos Villela | 01/05/2009 | |
| Ola Bini | 01/05/2009 | |
| Carlos Villela | 01/05/2009 | |
|
Re: I really like Ioke. How can I help? |
Ola Bini | 01/05/2009 |
