Re: Signal handling in JAG

[Jørgen Austvik <jaustvik@acm.org>]

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 17:54, Vemund Ostgaard - Oracle Norway
<vemund.ostgaard@oracle.com> wrote:
> So, I think the changes are useful, but it is not ideal to have to use a
> proprietary API. I have looked hard for other ways to achieve this, but no
> luck. Any opinions on this on whether such a change is ok or not?

I see it is even documented by IBM, so I think it should be safe.  It
is also probably a pretty small and contained change, so it is
probably not a lot of work to remove it if the API is ripped out of a
later version of JDK without any alternatives.

...so I think the change is OK :)

-J