afrank
|
Posted: September 17, 2009 16:53 by afrank
|
| Currently, several resource model definitions support an optional "description" field/attribute. To be consistent, wouldn't it make sense to add the optional "description" field/attribute to all resource model definitions? |
"Description" field/attribute
Replies: 3 - Last Post: September 25, 2009 02:15
by: Craig McClanahan
by: Craig McClanahan
showing 1 - 4 of 4
Craig McClanahan
|
Posted: September 25, 2009 02:15 by Craig McClanahan
|
|
I agree that this makes sense for all the objects that a client can initiate creation of. In my mind, that leaves out the Cloud, Interface, and Status resources that are always synthesized by the server, not created by the client. |
Replies: 3 - Last Post: September 25, 2009 02:15
by: Craig McClanahan
by: Craig McClanahan









