"Description" field/attribute

 29 topics, 131 posts  » Share this       
Replies: 3 - Last Post: September 25, 2009 02:15
by: Craig McClanahan
showing 1 - 4 of 4
 
Posted: September 17, 2009 16:53 by afrank
Currently, several resource model definitions support an optional "description" field/attribute. To be consistent, wouldn't it make sense to add the optional "description" field/attribute to all resource model definitions?
 
Posted: September 18, 2009 19:25 by Tim Bray
Yes. I think that if any lack "description", that's probably a bug.
 
Posted: September 20, 2009 17:46 by yadieet
I think the 'description' is important and it is not a serious problem.
 
Posted: September 25, 2009 02:15 by Craig McClanahan
I agree that this makes sense for all the objects that a client can initiate creation of. In my mind, that leaves out the Cloud, Interface, and Status resources that are always synthesized by the server, not created by the client.
Replies: 3 - Last Post: September 25, 2009 02:15
by: Craig McClanahan
  • Mysql
  • Glassfish
  • Jruby
  • Rails
  • Nblogo
Terms of Use; Privacy Policy;
© 2010, Oracle Corporation and/or its affiliates
(revision 20100312.9442df5)
 
 
loading
Please Confirm